Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Thermite

Thermite

By John S. Hatch

April 14, 2009 "Information Clearing House" -- -A recent article published in the respected peer-reviewed Open Chemical Physics Journal by nine noted scientists offers incontrovertible proof that the dust from the Twin Towers and Building Seven of the World Trade Center contains small intact samples of Thermite.

Thermite is a highly explosive agent consisting mostly of aluminum and iron oxide, and is used to cut steel in building controlled demolitions, and is also used in welding and in military applications.

Using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry, the scientists were able to determine that the Thermite present is of a specialized type called Nano-thermite or Superthermite. It burns hotter and has a lower ignition temperature than normal Thermite, and is produced at laboratories such as Lawrence Livermore, incidentally thought to be the same lab that produced the anthrax sent out shortly after 9/11.

Nano-thermite could not be accidentally present in dust samples collected at four different sites, nor could it be the result of clean-up operations at ground zero, as one of the samples was retrieved a mere ten minutes or so after the collapse of the second tower. All samples show the same consistency.

This would explain the streams of molten steel (not aluminum) falling from one of the towers, and the fact that steel remained molten in the rubble for more than a month after the event. There is no scientific explanation for this other than the use of Thermite, which can achieve temperatures of 3500 C, while under ideal conditions jet fuel can achieve just approximately 285 C. It would also explain the otherwise physically impossible near freefall speed of the three buildings, and how they were able to fall so homogeneously.

So what does it mean? It means that there is proof (which so far no one has attempted to refute) that the WTC buildings (and more than three thousand lives, counting the ongoing deaths of first responders and ordinary NYC citizens caused by the dust) were brought down by controlled demolition in a planned and purposeful manner by elements of the Bush Administration, most likely as a ‘catalyzing event’ , the new Pearl Harbor’ fondly mentioned by neo-con PNAC (Plan for the New American Century) and designed to galvanize American citizens in support of attacking other nations and restricting human rights at home. ‘Full Specter Domination’.

This was the excuse or invading Afghanistan and Iraq (there were plans for Syria and Iran as well, and perhaps others), for justifying domestic spying, disappearances, torture, and murder. Murder based on lies and deception, and the killing of American citizens.

Knowing, as he must by now, that 9/11 was conceived and executed not from some dark cave in Afghanistan, but much more likely from some deep bunker in dank Cheneystan, will President Obama still insist on ‘looking ahead’? Just how deep is America’s reserve of dismissal and denial?

I feel for all the victims of 9/11, past, present and future, but was especially haunted by those poor souls who chose to jump to their deaths, or who fell. Surely the people who did this need to be brought to justice. Otherwise America is not ‘looking ahead’. She has her eyes shut tight while she babbles inanities.

John S. Hatch is a Vancouver writer and film-maker. john.s.hatch@gmail.com

Well, another theory.
The thing that got me with this article are all the absolute statements......

"Nano-thermite could not be accidentally present in dust samples collected at four different sites, nor could it be the result of clean-up operations at ground zero, as one of the samples was retrieved a mere ten minutes or so after the collapse of the second tower. All samples show the same consistency."

The component parts that make thermite were indeed present in the building and could have mixed very easily, and the heat generated by the friction and pressure of the collapsing building would have been high enough to create the thermite reaction.


"This would explain the streams of molten steel (not aluminum) falling from one of the towers, and the fact that steel remained molten in the rubble for more than a month after the event. There is no scientific explanation for this other than the use of Thermite, which can achieve temperatures of 3500 C, while under ideal conditions jet fuel can achieve just approximately 285 C. It would also explain the otherwise physically impossible near freefall speed of the three buildings, and how they were able to fall so homogeneously."

The massive weight of the building in free fall pulverized everything below it, mixing the rusty steel superstructure with all other components of the building and its contents.
Aluminum?
Ceiling grid, office furniture, window frames, electronic equipment....
all aluminum.
zinc plated heating and air conditioner ducts, zinc burns at 907 degrees.
Here's a quote from Wiki on the subject...

"Additionally, flammable metals with relatively low boiling points such as zinc, whose boiling point of 907 °C (1665 °F) is about 1370 °C (2500 °F) below the temperature at which thermite burns, could potentially boil superheated metal violently into the air if near a thermite reaction, where it could then burst into flame as it is exposed to oxygen."

I disagree that there is no other explanation for the presence of molten steel other than thermite.
Due to the scale of the event, the environment within that collapse was beyond anything known at the time.
The intense heat and pressure caused by the collapse itself created conditions that were capable of producing what most people would conceive as "hell on earth" .
The collapse would have (absolute statement of my own) created thermite reactions throughout the entire building as it went down and those reactions would have continued for a long time after.


.


Friday, April 10, 2009

Stupid animal rights people


So Joe Biden chooses to buy a purebred German Shepard,
and the next thing up is an assault by the animal rights crowd.
False complaints made against the breeder along with death threats and harrassment to both the breeder and Biden.
Their claim that animal shelter killings are caused by people who buy from breeders is beyond ridiculous.
Animal shelters kill animals because they are overloaded with animals that are abandoned by their owners or are lost because they are allowed to roam free.
Breeders are no different than anyone else in the sense that some are responsible, ethical people and some aren't.
To blame a breeder for the actions of a pet owner is simply wrong.
I've met more un-ethical pet owners in my life than un-ethical breeders.
People who let their dogs run loose because they want them to be free!
Free to do what dogs do, apparently even if that means anything from shitting in the neighbors yard to killing their chickens, or free to get run over by a car or bite someone or free to be exposed to any of the numerous dog maladies that inhabit the "outside " world.
And then there's the folks who abandon the animals because they have to move,
the list goes on and on.
The actions of some of the animal rights people mirror that of the un-ethical animal owners when they do things like breaking into farms and letting loose animals that have never lived in the natural world and are sure to be dead within a week.
"ah, but at least they died free!" cry the animal rights fools.
The thing with breeding is......
it's been done for centuries, most of the animals that are part of our lives were bred to be that way, to our benefit.
Guide dogs, herding dogs, hunting dogs, watch dogs.
Other animals as well, a multitude of cows and horses, pigs, chickens, goats
and I missing anything?
The animal rights people need a little reality check,
as with breeders and anyone else, some are good with intentions to match and some really suck.
They need to get their own house in order first.

(story here)
.

I am a
Daffodil

What Flower
Are You?